Resurrect Capitalism!

March 20, 2009

Even Unions Hate Unions

Filed under: hypocrisy, unions — Tags: — admin @ 7:32 am

The SEIU (Service Employees International Union) is the most influential union in the nation.  They agitate for many legal changes that would benefit union members at the expense of employers.  Most notably, they are in full-force behind so-called “card check” legislation that would make it much easier for unions to form. 

It might come as a surprise then that the SEIU does not extend to its own employees the same benefits and protections that it agitates for on behalf of its members.  They are laying off a number of union members they employ and shifting work to contractors and temporary employees. 

The Service Employees International Union, considered the most influential union in the nation, has notified the union that represents about 220 of the SEIU’s national field staff members and organizers that it is laying off 75 of the employees.

In return, the workers union, which goes by the somewhat postmodern name of the Union of Union Representatives, has filed charges of unfair labor practices against the SEIU with the National Labor Relations Board. The workers union’s leaders say that the SEIU is engaging in the same kind of practices that some businesses use: laying off workers without proper notice, contracting out work to temporary-staffing firms, banning union activities and reclassifying workers to reduce union numbers.

I’m not surprised at all.  The SEIU is trying to do what any business does: control its costs.  Of course when a business does this SEIU will say that it is greedily exploiting employees and do anything in its power to stop the cost cutting.  But it’s OK for SEIU to layoff union members because this is a “special time”. 

SEIU officials say the layoffs are part of a long-running plan to reallocate resources. Its national office will devote more of its resources to lobbying and communications in Washington to take advantage of Democrats’ ascendance. Most organizing would be left to local chapters, where officials say they have identified dozens of openings for the laid-off staff.

“This is not a financial issue,” said SEIU President Andy Stern. “We need to respond to the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity our members created by helping elect President Obama.”

The SEIU is reallocating its recources towards where it judges they will be most effectively implemented.  If this is done to make a profit that is “bad”.  If reallocating resources is done to increase the exploitations from companies that is “good”. 

Hypocrites!  This should be getting much more media attention. 

"Do as I say, not as I do" SEIU President Andy Stern

“Do as I say, not as I do”, SEIU President & WEASEL Andy Stern

March 18, 2009

Removing the Union Chokehold

Filed under: entitlements, unions — Tags: — admin @ 11:18 am

I have been closely watching the bankruptcy proceedings of the city of Vallejo, California.  It is a medium-sized suburb of San Francisco that found its finances shattered by this economic downturn.  A major reason for its bankruptcy was its onerous public employee union contracts.  Unions refused to renegotiate their contracts as the municipal finances collapsed. 

Bankruptcy judge Michael McManus has ruled that Vallejo can void its union contracts as part of its restructuring.  The repercussions of this could be huge…  hugely POSITIVE for taxpayers!

“My understanding is that a lot of cities are watching this and particularly this motion,” said Woodruff. “If the city of Vallejo succeeds in using bankruptcy to void union contracts I am sure others will follow,” she said.

Vallejo attorney Norman C. Hile of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe’s Sacramento, Calif. office said, “This is a decision that is somewhat groundbreaking.”

Of course the unions will challenge this ruling.  Let’s hope the decision stands and public employee pay can be scaled back to more realistic levels everywhere.  Public employee pension and benefit costs are a ticking time bomb and the sooner the bomb is defused the better off all taxpayers will be. 

The entitlement mentality needs to be dismantled one piece at a time.  Why should union members not suffer the same pain and grief that the rest of us are enduring in this downturn? 

Somebody in California buy Judge McManus a beer!

March 5, 2009

Insatiable Gluttons

Filed under: Obama, entitlements, socialism, taxes, unions — Tags: , — admin @ 8:54 pm

It seems like every new day brings further news of layoffs, declines, and economic setbacks.  People are cutting spending.  Businesses are spending less as well.  With incomes down, unemployment up, and profits declining it is obvious that tax revenues will fall a bit everywhere.

So the logical course of action is to CUT SPENDING.  Of course Obama thinks that government can magically allocate capital better than private enterprise, so the federal government is instead dramatically increasing expenditures.

Surely state governments will be cutting expenditures, right?  Well, they are trying to.  The problem is that the wards of the state don’t like it when you mess with their hand-outs.  In New York City massive protests are underway to demonstrate against spending cuts:

Organizers estimate that 50,000 people have lined Broadway with a message to Gov. David Paterson that cuts are not the answer to fixing New York’s budget problems.

The protesters are made up of a widespread coalition of labor unions, community groups, and even families uniting to have their voices heard. Dubbing it a “Rally for New York,” they are rallying against proposed state and city budget cuts to public services, education, health care, along with other programs that impact families and the economy in New York.

Apparently massive tax increases wouldn’t “impact” the economy according to these protesters.  New York state already has among the highest taxes and costs of business in America.  Further tax increases would only exacerbate that.  Maybe all commerce can move down South.

the public sector
the public sector

Balancing a budget isn’t “rocket surgery”.  If you’re spending too much then you’re spending too much and you need to cut back.  The knee-jerk solution is not to further squeeze the taxpayers who are already enduring massive decreases in wealth and income.

Funny but I don’t see “downsized” private sector employees protesting.  Maybe it’s because they are mentally adults and accept that resources are finite and that nobody owes them a living.

The public sector is an insatiable glutton.  Its capacity to consume is infinite and it must somehow be stopped.  Of course as part of Obama’s “stimulus plan” there is a lot of money doled out to state governments to prop up their excessive spending habits.  Obama is doing EVERYTHING wrong in his handling of this crisis.

February 11, 2009

And Then the Unthinkable Happened…

Filed under: entitlements, politics, unions — Tags: , , — admin @ 11:52 pm

The city of Vallejo, CA made the news last year for going bankrupt.  The city coffers swelled during the 2000’s real estate boom.  As that bubble popped real estate tax revenue dried up and the town went bankrupt due to its unsustainable obligations.  One of the major costs that broke the city was the cost of employing public sector union members.

Now, after much haggling and legal wrangling with the bankrupt municipality the unthinkable has happened: public employee union members actually accepted a cut in entitlements.  Public employee unions typically fight tooth and claw against getting small increases in benefits & pay (never mind outright decreases) so this is actually significant.  OK, so the town had to go bankrupt to renegotiate its union contracts but at least it happened.  This is why bankruptcy was created.  It allows an entity to renegotiate unsustainable agreements.

Some concessions CAMP members made in their supplemental contract include dismissal of all bankruptcy-related damage claims against the city, limited unpaid furlough in the next two fiscal years, a reduction in medical benefits coverage — starting in 2010 — and further reduced retiree medical benefits for new hires. Also, new employees will be unable to cash out accrued sick leave or gain longevity pay.

Notice what didn’t happen: the union members are not down and out.  Unions don’t want to accept even the smallest cuts and will wage fear-mongering propaganda campaigns about the horrors that await the budget ax.  But ultimately the union members accepted mild entitlement concessions so that their city could regain solvency.  Sounds like a win-win deal to me.

The Detroit automakers should do the same thing as the city of Vallejo.  Go bankrupt and renegotiate your labor agreements.  Wring some concessions out of them and regain the ability to profitably manufacture cars.  Instead the bailout of the Detroit three has prevented (at least temporarily) the marketplace feedback from influencing labor agreements.  We taxpayers are footing the bill for unsustainable UAW union labor practices.

On that note, here is a sad story: the main manufacturing plant in my Central New York hometown, Magna International / New process Gear, is closing down.  The factory has been financially wobbling for some time and the closing was precipitated by UAW members voting against accepting wage and benefit concessions.  Some of my friends from high school and family members work for that plant.  They didn’t want pay cuts but now they are going to get a 100% cut in pay. Through the years the UAW fought tooth and claw against every single effort to control labor costs and this “no” vote was simply the straw that broke the camel’s back.

I don’t want to think about what this closing will do to the area:

When the afternoon shift let out, there wasn’t a worker in sight at the normally crowded McShane’s. “All the factory jobs we’ve already lost - General Motors, Marcellus Casket Company, Carrier, Crouse Hinds, Syracuse China, and now Magna, what’s left?” asked [McShane's manager] Doran.

Nothing is left.  My home region used to be a manufacturing powerhouse.  Now it is a vegetable on life support, with various handouts from the state as the dominant industries.  Some of the job losses are due to outsourcing but many of those jobs have just moved to more business-friendly climates down south.  The tax and regulatory environment simply make New York state an uncompetitive place to do business.  Upstate New York needs capitalism badly.

Say hello to your future, New York:

detroit_ruins

Powered by WordPress